Manchester United has announced a five percent increase in season-ticket prices as part of Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s financial overhaul to cut costs and boost revenue which has sparked backlash from fans.
Manchester United supporters had long seen this financial reckoning coming. Ever since INEOS and British billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe secured partial ownership of the club, the focus has been on trimming costs and maximizing revenue. Now, fans are feeling the pinch firsthand.
Ratcliffe has repeatedly warned of United’s dire financial state, controversially suggesting the club would have gone “bust” by Christmas without drastic changes.
This transformation has included slashing corporate expenses, reducing ambassadorial payments to club legend Sir Alex Ferguson, and axing up to 450 staff members.
Olympic champion Gabby Thomas explains why she opted for a second job after finding out that there’s no enough money on the track.
The overarching goal? To make United the “most profitable club in the world” while complying with the Premier League’s stringent Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR).
The importance of Champions League revenue
As reported by The Athletic, one of the most effective ways to increase revenue is through success on the pitch. Champions League qualification alone brings substantial financial windfalls.
However, United’s current 13th-place standing in the Premier League threatens another season without Europe’s elite competition. While their Europa League quarter-final run offers a potential lifeline, failure to qualify for Europe could severely impact finances.
To improve financial sustainability, Ratcliffe has emphasised a smarter approach to player trading, recruitment, and wage control. The club has historically squandered vast sums on transfers and salaries for underperforming players—an issue Ratcliffe aims to rectify.
)
Harambee Stars coach Benni McCarthy finalizes his 23-man squad for crucial 2026 World Cup qualifiers against Gambia on March 20 and Gabon on March 23.
Yet, restructuring the squad and revamping recruitment won’t yield immediate results. In the meantime, United have turned to another revenue source: their loyal fanbase.
Ticket price hikes
For over a decade under the Glazers, United froze ticket prices, largely to avoid further inflaming fan discontent.
However, Ratcliffe’s regime is adopting a different approach. On Monday, United announced a five percent increase in season-ticket prices—the third consecutive hike in as many years. The club argues that rising operational costs make these adjustments unavoidable.
This decision is part of a broader ticketing overhaul expected to generate over £15 million. Among the changes is a new match categorization system, where ticket prices for non-season ticket holders will be set according to demand. Games against traditional Big Six rivals, for instance, will carry premium pricing.
MUST (Manchester United Supporters’ Trust) has voiced serious concerns, particularly about the potential for excessive price hikes under this model.
)
African footballers have enjoyed massive success on and off the field. While the huge perks is a reward for hard work, some of them own luxurious private jets.
The club is also relocating fans seated behind the dugouts to repurpose those high-demand seats as hospitality packages—a move mirroring Chelsea’s controversial “dugout experience,” where some tickets fetch up to £12,500.
Further aggravating fans is the introduction of a £10 charge for ticket resale within two weeks of a match, as well as a 15 percent increase in parking fees.
Balancing act or short-term fix?
Despite the uproar, some fans acknowledge that initial plans were even more severe. Ratcliffe’s team reportedly considered a 20 percent season-ticket hike but scaled it back following discussions with the Fans’ Advisory Board (FAB).
While many Premier League clubs, including Tottenham and Liverpool, have opted to freeze ticket prices, Newcastle and Brighton have also implemented five percent increases, while Nottingham Forest’s rise averages 8.5 percent.
United’s leadership insists the changes strike a balance between financial stability and fairness. “We understand that any price rise is unwelcome, especially during a period of underperformance on the pitch,” said CEO Omar Berrada. “But the club cannot continue to absorb rising costs indefinitely.”
The bigger picture
Ratcliffe has made it clear that United’s commercial approach will shift towards controlled spending rather than relentless pursuit of new sponsors.
However, with fans already disillusioned by poor performances and the Glazers’ continued involvement, these price hikes risk further alienation.
Ultimately, if United fail to turn things around on the pitch, no amount of financial restructuring will shield them from mounting frustration among their supporters.
