A blow to William Ruto in court deciding the resolution is the party with the majority members

• The Supreme Court ruled that Kenya first is not a majority party in the National Assembly, changing the decision of Speaker Moses Wetang'ula of 2022
• The judges found that Wetang'ula ignored evidence from the Registrar of Political Parties and renewed 14 members to Kenya first illegally
• The court criticized Wetang'ula for making decisions to rely on one side, warning that Parliament should not rely on the public decision
• The court also decided that Wetangula could not serve as Speaker and leader of Ford Kenya, facing another blow to his political influence

Nairobi – The Supreme Court has issued a huge blow to the President William Ruto After deciding that the first Kenyan Union is not a majority party in the national parliament.

The court found that the Speaker of the National Assembly Moses Wetang'ula violated the constitution when he announced Kenya first Be a majority party in October 2022.

Also read

USAID: Fears spread as many Kenyans losing work following Donald Trump to stop the funding

In a decision made by three judges on Friday, February 7, judges John Chigiti, Jairus Ngaah, and Lawrence Mugambi confirmed that Union Declaration One Kenya Coalition Party is the lawful to hold the majority in the national parliament.

The decision followed Wetang'ula's complex decision to reorganize 14 members from various parties to Kenya first, and to change the balance of authority and favor the ruling coalition.

However, the court said that the Speaker had no legal reasons for the decision.

How did Wetang'ula violate the constitution

The three judges' bench said that although the Speaker of Parliament had evidence from the Registrar of Political Parties showing that the Resolution Coalition was the main party, he completely ignored the evidence.

The judges said that the allegations of the Speaker and the leader of the majority Kimani Ichung'wa that there was a post -election agreement between One Kenya Alliance and other Resolution Coalition parties were never supported by any evidence.

Also read

Homa Bay: The wife of an elder of the SDA church killed by being stabbed in front of the partners telling the incident

“Based on the information provided by the Registrar of Political Parties, these parties were members of the Union Declaration. There was no evidence that this court or any court terminated the Union Declaration Convention,” the judges said in one statement.

The judges insisted that the voters had already decided the majority party through the electoral process and that the Speaker's decision could not overturn the voters' wishes.

Why is Wetang'ula's impartiality examined

As a result, the Supreme Court has issued an order to overturn the declaration of Wetangula that the Union of Kenya is the first party in the national parliament.

This decision signifies a major legal victory for a coalition resolution and raises questions about the speaker's impartiality in dealing with Parliamentary matters.

As a result, the Supreme Court has issued an order to overturn the declaration of Wetangula that the Union of Kenya is the first party in the national parliament.

Also read

Good Samaritans donate KSh 200k to give a woman who was expelled from the Pasta Church Ng'ang'a Tax

This decision signifies a major legal victory for a coalition resolution and raises questions about the speaker's impartiality in dealing with Parliamentary matters.

Read English version

Do you have an exciting information that you would like to publish? Please, contact us via news@tuko.co.ke or WhatsApp: 0732482690.

Source: TUKO.co.ke